Board Games » Reviews » Party » Codenames Board Game Review and Rules

Codenames Board Game Review and Rules

Released back in 2015 Codenames was one of those games that took the board game scene by storm. Eventually winning the Spiel Des Jahres in 2016, Codenames has already become one of the highest rated board games of all time. Codenames is a really interesting idea because it combines a spy theme with a party word game. While it was hard not to hear about how great Codenames was, until recently I didn’t have the opportunity to try the game. So does it live up to its’ hype? It might not be quite perfect but Codenames is the best party word game that I have ever played.

How to Play | My Thoughts | Should You Buy? | Comments

How to Play Codenames

Setup

  • The players split into two teams with each team choosing one of the colors.
  • Each team will choose one player to be their spymaster. Both spymasters must sit on the same side of the table. The rest of the players sit on the other side of the table.
  • The agent cards are placed in front of the corresponding spymaster. The innocent bystander and assassin cards are placed between both spymasters.
  • The players randomly choose 25 of the word cards and place them in a 5 x 5 grid.
  • The spymasters will choose one of the key cards and place it into the stand facing them.
  • The team whose color is on the sides of the key card starts the game. The team that starts the game is given the double agent card to add to their pile of agents.

Setup for Codenames

Playing the Game

Before starting the game both spymasters should study the grid. Each spymaster is trying to get their teammates to guess all of the words corresponding to their color. The pale squares are the innocent bystanders and the assassin is the black X. The spymaster wants to avoid having their teammates guess the word corresponding to the assassin.

Secret Identities in Codenames
The red team has to guess stadium, grace, day, doctor, paper, death, Tokyo, and mug. The blue team has to guess key, mouse, yard, screen, calf, Hollywood, water, phoenix, and bar. If either team picks “pass” during the game they will automatically lose.

Starting with the spymaster for the first team, each team will take turns trying to get their teammates to pick the words corresponding to their agents. Each spymaster gives their team a one-word clue. When giving clues the following rules must be followed:

  • A player can’t give a clue that is the same or similar to one of the face up word cards. Once the word is covered up the player can then give the clue. The player can also not use part of a face up compound word until it is covered up.
  • The clue should be based off the meaning of the word(s) they are trying to get their teammates to guess.
  • A player can only give letter and number clues if it relates to the meaning of the word(s). For example a player can’t use a letter clue to refer to words starting with a given letter.
  • All clues should be in English unless the word is commonly used in English.
  • A spymaster cannot give any visual clues to help lead their team towards choosing a word.

If a spymaster gives an invalid clue their turn ends immediately. The other team’s spymaster also gets to cover up one of their agent words.

After giving the clue the spymaster decides how many of their agents’ codenames can be described by the clue they gave. This number can’t be used as a clue for the word(s) they want their teammates to guess.

Clue in Codenames
This team’s spymaster has decided to give the clue “movie 2”. With this clue the player is trying to get their teammates to choose Hollywood and screen.

The other players on the team then have to try and figure out what words the spymaster was hinting towards. When the players have agreed on a word one of the players points to the word they choose. The spymaster then reveals the identity of the word chosen.

  • If the chosen card is the identity of the assassin, the current team automatically loses the game.

    Assassin in Codenames
    This team has unveiled the assassin so they have lost the game.
  • If the chosen card is one of the innocent bystanders, the spymaster places one of the innocent bystander cards on the word. The current team’s turn ends.

    Innocent Bystander in Codenames
    This team has revealed an innocent bystander so their turn ends immediately.
  • If the chosen card is one of the other team’s agents, the spymaster places one of the other team’s agent cards on the word. The current team’s turn ends.
  • If the chosen card is one of the current team’s agents, the spymaster puts one of their own cards on the word. The current team will then continue their turn.

    Finding an Agent in Codenames
    This team has found one of their agents so their turn continues.

If the team guessed one of their own agents they may have the opportunity to make another guess. The team can make as many guesses as the number the spymaster gave as part of their clue plus one. The team can also choose to end their turn at any time after they have made one guess. Once a team has either made all of their guesses, picked a word that doesn’t match one of their agents, or have decided to stop; play passes to the other team.

End of Game

The game can end in one of two ways.

If a team picks the assassin, the other team wins automatically.

Otherwise whichever team has all of their agents revealed first wins the game.

Winning Codenames
The blue team has revealed all of their agents so they have won the game.

My Thoughts on Codenames

If I hadn’t already known about Codenames and someone would have told me about a board game that combined a word game with a spy theme, I wouldn’t have known what to think. The concept is interesting but I would have wondered how that concept would even work. It might have seen like a weird combination at first but it works perfectly for Codenames.

Having played hundreds of different board games I have seen a lot of different mechanics. In particular I have played a lot of word and party games. Despite playing so many different games in both genres, I can confidently say that I haven’t played a game that plays quitehttp://www.geekyhobbies.com/game-of-the-generals-aka-salpakan-review-and-rules/ like Codenames. The premise behind the game is just so clever. Each team is trying to contact their agents using their codenames. Only one of the team members know the identities of their agents though so they have to give clues to help their teammates find all of their agents.

What is so great about Codenames is that the main mechanic is so engaging. Codenames really only has one main mechanic but it works so well that there is no need for other mechanics. The reason that Codenames is such a great game is because the game is accessible while also giving players plenty of options. The mechanic is so simple that you can teach the game to new players in minutes. Children and people who rarely ever play board games can easily pick up the game. Codenames is one of those party games that you can use to try and get people more interested in board games.

In addition to being accessible, Codenames is just a ton of fun. The main mechanic is just so satisfying. Instead of wasting time on mechanics that just extend the game, Codenames focuses on the one mechanic that is pure fun. By the end of your first game you will be begging to play another game.

While Codenames is an accessible game I also think it has a decent amount of strategy. I think the most interesting decision in Codenames for the spymasters is deciding how aggressive they are going to be. If you play the game really passive you will likely always pick your own agents but you likely will only get one or two agents each turn. Your team will also likely fall behind the other team. Spymasters can also choose to be more aggressive using clues that apply to more of their agents. If successful this can lead to a team getting a large lead in the game. If unsuccessful it could lead to picking an innocent bystander, one of the other team’s agents, or worst the assassin.

So is it good to be aggressive or passive? I think it is best to be somewhere in the middle. If a team is too passive the other team will likely get far ahead and can then cruise to victory. If you’re too aggressive though you could end your turn early, give the other team one of their agents, or even lose the game for your team. For your first clue you probably want to aim for three or four agents if possible as long as the clue doesn’t apply to the assassin. If you are more aggressive at the beginning of the round you can then be more cautious with the last couple of agents as they likely won’t really connect to one another.

In addition to being a good idea strategically, playing somewhat aggressive is key to making the most out of the game. Giving one clue for each word gets boring pretty quickly. There is no challenge in giving obvious clues. On the other hand taking a chance can be so rewarding. Trying to think of clever clues that apply to several of your agents makes the game. You get a real a sense of accomplishment from coming up with a clue that gets your team to guess four or more of your agents.

One of the things that make you want to keep coming back to Codenames is the fact that the game can become quite tense. What I mean by tense is that the game can drastically change at any time. A team could be destroying the other team and then choose the assassin and automatically lose. Choosing one of the other team’s agents can also swing the momentum as you help out the other team and lose the rest of your turn. The game is tense because any clue or choice can totally change the game. If one team is significantly more experienced in the game they might blow out the other team. Most games will end with both teams being really close to one another though. In every game I played I think the winning team won by only one or two agents. The game being close until the very end makes for a tense but very enjoyable experience.

While Codenames is one of the best games that I have ever played, it is not perfect. The main complaint I have with Codenames is that it does rely on a little luck. Basically one team may be given an advantage solely based on how their agent words connect to one another. One team could be given a lot of words that can be connected to one another while the other team doesn’t. This will give the team with more connected words a pretty big advantage in the game. Generally both sides will be pretty balanced but there will be the occasional game where one team has a significant advantage at the beginning of the game. With the game being randomly set up each time though this couldn’t have been avoided. Each game is also short enough (around 15 minutes) that it doesn’t become that big of a problem. I will take the variety of randomized games in exchange for an occasional game where one team is given an advantage.

The other small complaint I have with Codenames is that there is a decent amount of sitting around waiting for the other team. While the spymaster can be thinking of their next clue, the rest of the team basically has to sit around waiting for the other team. With each game being so short though this isn’t that big of an issue. Unless the other team is filled with players who suffer from analysis paralysis you should only have to wait a couple minutes at a time.

On the component front Codenames also excels. The quality of the components is basically what you would expect out of a party game. The artwork is nice even if most of the cards just feature words. The best part of the components is the fact that the game gives you a lot of cards. Between 200 words cards (which are double sided) and 40 key cards, I honestly can’t see two games ever being the same. If that would ever happen you probably have already played the game hundreds of times and already got your money out of the game. Even if you got sick of the words included with the game it wouldn’t be that hard to make your own word cards. I don’t think you will ever have to worry about Codenames getting repetitive.

With the popularity of Codenames it should not come as a surprise that the game has had several spinoff games in the last couple of years. In 2016 Codenames: Pictures and Codenames: Deep Undercover were released. Codenames: Pictures is the same as normal Codenames except that the agents correspond to pictures instead of words. Codenames: Deep Undercover is apparently Codenames meets Cards Against Humanity since it features more “adult” words. This year (2017) has had three Codenames releases Codenames: Duet, Codenames: Disney, and Codenames: Marvel. Codenames: Duet is a cooperative two player version of the game where each player can see half of the agents while the other player can see the other half of the agents. Codenames: Disney and Codenames: Marvel are basically just themed versions of the normal game.

Should You Buy Codenames?

Codenames might not be the best board game that I have ever played but it is near the top. It is the best party word game that I have ever played and I can’t see that changing anytime soon. What is so great about Codenames is that the main mechanic is so unique. I have played a lot of board games and I have never seen a mechanic like it. The game is really easy to play and yet still requires quite a bit of strategy/skill. The game is tense as the outcome of most games won’t be decided until the very end. The only small complaints I have with Codenames is that occasionally one team will get an advantage due to luck and you sometimes have to wait around for the other team. Those small complaints are quickly forgotten as it is hard to not want to immediately play another game of Codenames.

I highly recommend picking up Codenames. The only people that I can see possibly not enjoying the game are people that hate both party and word games. Otherwise I would highly recommend purchasing Codenames. Codenames is one of those games that should be in everyone’s collection.

If you would like to purchase Codenames you can find it online: Amazon, eBay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Information


css.php